Wisconsin’s higher ed budget standoff comes to an end
A nearly six-month standoff between the Universities of Wisconsin and the Republican-led state legislature over diversity, equity and inclusion spending seems poised to end.
UW system president Jay Rothman and UW Madison Chancellor Jennifer Mnookin announced Friday morning that they’d reached a deal with assembly speaker Robin Vos: the system will make significant concessions on DEI initiatives and staffing in exchange for over $800 million in funding for pay raises, utilities and construction projects — including a new engineering building at UW Madison, which the legislature rejected last month.
“The agreement we’ve reached is the result of an arduous process,” Rothman said during a press conference Friday afternoon. “While it funds UW, it also makes compromises to get there.”
The Board of Regents will vote on the resolution at a special meeting Saturday morning. The proposal includes the following concessions from the system:
- A cap on all DEI hires to remain in place for 3 years.
- The redistribution of one-third of DEI staff—about 45 system employees—to other offices under the rubric of student success.
- A 3-year freeze on all new administrative hires across the system.
- Elimination of the UW TOP program, an initiative to promote diverse faculty hires, to be replaced starting next year with a program promoting faculty who support underrepresented and “at risk” students students.
- Excising the diversity statement prospective students are expected to sign on their application to UW institutions.
- Creating a new endowed faculty chair at UW Madison dedicated to conservative economic thought, classical economics, or classical liberalism.
- Implementing a new module on free expression for all entering undergraduate students.
- Adoption of a guaranteed admissions program for the top 10 percent of state high school graduates, who would automatically be accepted to all UW schools except for Madison, which would take the top 5 percent.
In return, the state legislature would free up funding for pay raises by December 31 at the latest, as well as a over $800 million in funding for utilities, maintenance and essential construction projects like new dormitories and the long-awaited engineering facility at UW Madison.
The UW system’s struggle to secure the funds is part of a deepening nationwide political schism over diversity, equity and inclusion spending, especially at public universities. The state has avoided the kind of anti-DEI legislation that passed in red states such as Florida and Tennessee largely because there is a Democrat in the governor’s office.
“Our caucus objective has always been aimed at dismantling the bureaucracy and division related to DEI,” Vos wrote in a statement announcing the deal. “I’m proud that Wisconsin is the first state with [a] divided government to make real progress on reducing these negative influences across our public higher education institutions.”
The system faces opposition to the deal from faculty and students, who worry that it represents a hard-fought victory for the right wing of the legislature and deals a blow to students and faculty of color at an already difficult time in higher ed for racial minorities.
“We do not want our administration to make a deal that sacrifices much-needed DEI resources for our students,” said Jon Shelton, the vice president for higher education at the American Federation of Teachers-Wisconsin, the statewide public educators union. “Not that we want to forego a salary increase, but if it’s a choice between that and our students’ needs we’re going to stand with our students.”
Rothman emphasized repeatedly that the system’s “commitment to values of diversity and inclusion” were unaffected by the deal. Mnookin said that DEI was not going away, but rather that the system was beginning the process of “reimagining” it along the lines of student success—a message that echoes those of other public universities that have restructured their DEI offices under political pressure. But both leaders recognized that the outcome is far from ideal.
“Neither side thinks this is the greatest thing since sliced bread,” Rothman said. “That’s just reality.”
Critics described the war of attrition that played out in the Wisconsin legislature as an unorthodox tactic in an increasingly bitter conflict, and its success could embolden other states with split governments, such as Kentucky, to take similar action.
Rep. Dora Drake, a Democrat and member of the House Black caucus, said that while she understands the pressure the system has been under, the money isn’t worth the price of the political and cultural victory she believes the system would be handing to Wisconsin Republicans—and other conservative state legislators across the country.
“I’m sympathetic, and [the system leaders] are in a tough position. But there are some things you just can’t compromise on,” she told Inside Higher Ed. “If we concede now, there’s no stopping that train.”
A War of Attrition
In June, house speaker Vos held up a vote on the state budget by proposing a last-minute $32 million cut to the system—the amount that Vos alleged UW is currently spending on the salaries of DEI-focused employees— unless the university eliminated its DEI offices and positions. Gov. Tony Evers, a Democrat, threatened to veto the entire state budget, and the appropriations process ground to a halt.
The state budget wound up passing with a partial veto by Evers that prevented DEI staff cuts, though it still included significant cuts to higher ed funding in a year of ample financial surplus for the state. But at the last minute Vos made good on his threat to block the $32 million, which the system had earmarked for staff cost of living adjustments and raises. That money has been in limbo ever since.
After months at a standstill, the pitched battle over the withheld higher ed funding reached a boiling point this fall. Gov. Evers sued Republican lawmakers for “obstructing basic government functions” by freezing funding. In early November, the UW system proposed a plan to secure the money by promising to invest the funds in workforce development for engineers, nurses, data scientists and businesspeople, but Vos stood firm in his demand that the university also cut back on diversity programs.
Secret negotiations between system leaders and lawmakers have been underway for weeks, according to legislators with knowledge of the dealmaking, as a last-resort effort to secure the funds and end the impasse.
“This has been a difficult process,” Mnookin said during Friday’s press conference with Rothman. “We recognize the stress and strain this has caused our communities as it has played out over the past 6 months, partly in public.”
In putting the DEI restructuring proposal to the Board of Regents Saturday, the deal circumvents Gov. Evers and his veto power, which killed the proposed DEI cuts the first time around. Only the final funding proposal and the guaranteed admission plan will pass through the state government; the rest will be decided by the board.
“[State Republicans] are trying to make sure nothing concerning DEI ever has to come through the legislature and be subject to Evers’ veto,” Drake said. “It’s absolutely about circumventing that failsafe. They’re desperate to demonstrate their power.”
The whole ordeal has been a grand display of “political showmanship” from state Republicans in general, and Vos in particular, Drake said.
“He had every opportunity to come to a compromise, but instead he put his foot in his mouth and we haven’t moved an inch,” she said. “It’s downright insulting.”
The Dangers of Budgetary ‘Brinkmanship’
Tom Harnisch, Executive Vice President of the State Higher Education Executive Officers Association (SHEEO), expressed worry that legislators don’t understand how much their entrenched position could damage the system’s reputation and ability to function—or worse, that they don’t care.
“Higher education is vulnerable to these kinds of political games from state lawmakers, as it does not have the political power of other state interest groups,” he said. “This kind of brinkmanship is really disappointing, not to mention short-sighted… the Universit[ies] of Wisconsin is a huge economic asset to the state, and it should be treated as such.”
Shelton, who is also a professor of justice studies at UW Green Bay, said the effects of what he calls politically punishing budget cuts are already showing throughout the system—especially at smaller campuses facing severe deficits after a decade of austerity. In the past two months, UW Green Bay announced that it would cut six majors and minors; UW Platteville cut 12 percent of its workforce, eliminating over 100 positions; and UW Oshkosh, facing an $18 million shortfall, cut 200 positions and laid off 140 employees.
“I’ve been at the UW system for 11 years, through Act 55 in 2015 that took away shared governance and tenure and through rounds of massive budget cuts,” he said. “This is the worst I’ve ever seen faculty and staff morale.”
Rothman seemed conscious of the worsening tension between higher education and state policymakers, and said he hoped the deal could be a first step in realigning the system’s goals with those of the legislature.
“This agreement can hopefully reset our relationship with the legislature,” he said. “Our universities rank 42nd in the nation for public funding; we will continue to advocate for our state to do better.”
Harnisch said it’s not just DEI driving the budget crisis in Wisconsin; after generations of legislative commitment to higher education as a public good, a political shift in the early 2000s has led to years of cuts and stagnation, which the university systems have struggled to overcome.
“Every budget cycle for the past 10 years, the Wisconsin legislature conjures up a new reason not to fund the UW system,” he said. “Now it’s DEI, but in 2025 it will be something else.”
Post Publications || Join us on Whatsapp || Post Disclaimer
SEND A STORY: Do you have a story for us or need a promotion/advertisement? Submit them via our email admin@edulearnweb or Ghanaeducation.org
TELEGRAM PAGE >>> [JOIN]
DOWNLOAD OUR EDUCATION NEWS APP - MOBILE APP
JOIN OUR EDUCATION NEW GROUPS (WHATSAPP)
Join one of our Whatsapp/Telegram Groups for current Ghana Education Service News Updates:
JOIN ONLY ONE... THANKS
TELEGRAM PAGE >>> [JOIN]
Group 1 >>New Group> [JOIN]
Group 2 >>New Group> [JOIN]
TELEGRAM PAGE >>> [JOIN]
Only websites that give us a URL backlink can repost our content on their sites.
The information contained in this post is for general information purposes only. The information is provided by edulearnweb.com and while we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the post for any purpose.
||About Us|| Contact Us